Küçük C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor Hakkında Gerçekler Bilinen.

Küçük C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor Hakkında Gerçekler Bilinen.

Blog Article

You cannot predict the future. Assuming that a property's type will always be beneficial as a List is immediately limiting your ability to adapt to unforeseen expectations of your code.

Maybe take it into a List of T rather than ArrayList, so that you get type safety and more options for how you implement the comparer.

Bu kent, istenmeyenleri azaltmak bâtınin Akismet kullanıyor. Değerlendirme verilerinizin nasıl medarımaişetlendiği üzerine elan bir araba bilgelik edinin.

The following example demonstrates the implementation of the IList interface to create a simple, fixed-size list.

IList is a interface and doesn't have any implementation, so the performance of IList depending the class it implements

Örneğin, süflidaki kodda bir IAnimal tipinde bir oynak tanılamamladım ve bu değkârkene Dog ve Cat nesneleri atadım.

You are most often better of using the most general usable type, in this case the IList or even better the IEnumerable interface, so that you dirilik switch the implementation conveniently at a later time.

Matthew WatsonMatthew Watson 108k1111 gold badges170170 silver badges290290 bronze badges 2 2 This is trivially true for every interface. If you want to follow through with your argument, than you could argue to never use any interface at all, because some implementation of it might throw.

For collections you should aim to use IEnumerable where possible. This gives the most flexibility but is not always suited.

It really comes down to the kind of functionality you need. I'd suggest using the List class in most cases. IList is best for when you need to make a custom array that could have some very specific rules that you'd like to encapsulate within a collection so you don't repeat C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız yourself, but still want .NET to recognize it kakım a list.

However, this makes the method more fragile, as any change to the returned object type may break the calling code. In practice though, that generally isn't a major problem.

I leave this up to show that if you needed to do it (e.g. C# IList Kullanımı the off chance a third party library returned a List that you needed to convert for another 3rd party library), you hayat do it this way.

If you use the concrete type all callers need to be updated. C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız If exposed bey IList the caller doesn't have to be changed.

There is a complication though that dynamic kişi't see explicit implementations, so something kişi implement IList and IList-of-T and C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor yet C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır still be completely unusable from dynamic.